Are spy-in-sky camera drones really the best way to police Britain’s roads or just a new option to boost PCN revenue and profits from high-tech war machines?

It would seem that our real Big Brother in Britain plans to use unmanned spy drone cameras to look after us even better than before. Ah, how lovely you may think. But maybe not...

Frankly, I am quite concerned by the idea of UK police using such high-tech spy-in-the-sky kit, currently deployed in war zones like Afghanistan, but now for ‘routine’ monitoring of riders, motorists and protesters, in our occasionally Green and Pleasant Land. There are also some bloggers out there like BB Watch who take a very dim view of this latest news. To be fair though, these new additions to the armoury of surveillance equipment our governors and private enforcement companies have to hand are not called spy drones at all. Oh no.

It seems, according to responses to a Freedom of Information FOI request submitted by the Guardian that the folk who make this kit are the arms manufacturer BAE Systems, and they produce a range of ‘unmanned aerial vehicles’ aka UAVs. Worryingly though for some of us perhaps, good old BAE is converting a fleet of UAVs from use in warfare to use by a consortium of government agencies led by Kent police.
The FOI request forced release of report documents from the soothingly titled South Coast Partnership. But it turns out that this is a Home Office-backed project in which Kent police and others are developing a national drone plan with BAE.

There report reveals the following news:

“Five other police forces have signed up to the scheme, which is considered a pilot preceding the countrywide adoption of the technology for “surveillance, monitoring and evidence gathering”. The partnership’s stated mission is to introduce drones “into the routine work of the police, border authorities and other government agencies” across the UK.”

So there you go then. And all I can say to anyone who is starting to harbour suspicions that this plan may not be entirely driven by an earnest desire to look after us all better than ever could be in danger. And the danger you’d be in is of joining that widely reviled group called sceptics. And for those who go further with thoughts that a primary driver for getting this kit into action is to dish out loads more penalty charge notices PCNs for such heinous crimes as exceeding speed limits by a few mile and hour etc. could be in graver danger still. You could be heading down the slippery slopes to the doom of becoming an extreme cynic…

Record depths reached in push to be Britain’s top ‘Robber Baron’, just another cut in ‘free’ parking, or could this be good news for bike parking tax opponents?…

I am rarely surprised by the depths that a desperate politician will plunge to, while trying to justify action that stinks. In my experience this often happens when a plan for a government move is being pushed that is nothing more than state backed extortion or highway robbery – and that looks to most law abiding citizens like the acts of a robber baron rather than a servant of the people.

But as you can see by the expression on Cllr Chalkley’s face, even he is struggling to make it look straight as he tries to deny that his council’s latest plan to end ‘free’ parking in London’s West End and throughout Westminster, is just a new way to screw more cash from riders of motorcycles and scooters and motorists.

On the face of it this latest plan by WCC may seem like very bad news. In essence it is to put parking charges up again and end ‘free’ parking on single yellow lines up till midnight!  But I think that there is a huge silver lining to this otherwise very dark cloud, and especially  for all who have been battling with Westminster over their attempts to make an ‘experimental’ M/C parking tax a permanent fixture. More details at NTBPT. The bottom line here for me is that this latest move is already being seen by the majority of people and businesses in the West End as nothing more than a revenue grabbing move that will do a great deal more harm to all concerned than good. In turn, this majority in the heart of the capital will start to see the riders who have taken to the streets to oppose the council’s tax attacks on them less like a nuisance – and more like knights in shinning armour – and no matter whether the steeds they ride are great big motorbikes or nifty scooters.

Another key factor here for me – and IMHO all riders to consider – is that this is NOT A PARTY POLITICAL ISSUE. Westminster are of course a Tory council, but UK councils of every colour including Labour and Lib Dem, have, up until now, followed WCC’s lead in creating ever more sophisticated cash cows for milking motorists in the name of ‘traffic management’ – and supposedly ‘encouraging’ people to walk, cycle or go by privatised ‘public transport’. And, of greatest concern to me, they are also watching with keen interest to see if Westminster can get away with turning all motorcycle and scooter riders into a new source of local revenue by imposing extra road user taxes targeted at them.

Now, back to my views on the latest in Westminster and the pic of Chalkley. My choice of image may seem a tad unfair as this shot may have caught him at a ‘bad’ moment. Even more revealing though (as you can see in the BBC interview linked below) is the long pause as he says “…err…” while composing himself to deliver a statement that looks to me like a bit of a fib! To be frank though, anyone prone to strong feelings about weaselly attempts to justify more tax, under the cover of ecoist faith or ‘traffic management’, may even suggest that what our elected member may be saying about Westminster’s latest plan is a heaving steamer!

Nevertheless, in the sprit of fairness and decency that I try to live and write by, all I can say about whether lies are being told or not is that you will have to make your own mind up. And, you may find this live BBC interview helpful in drawing your own conclusions.

What I will say though is that one of things that troubles me most about this latest plan to end what is commonly described as ‘free’ parking – including by the objectivity seeking BBC – is that PARKING A MOTORCYCLE, SCOOTER OR ANY OTHER PRIVATE MOTOR VEHICLE IS NEVER FREE in Britain. As I and others have said before, all law abiding vehicle owners in the UK pay far more in motoring taxes and duties than most people in the developed world, and vastly more than is ever spent on public highways.

Lastly, I will add that the real reasons why congestion continues to be a great problem in UK towns and cities, and especially Westminster has nothing to do with parking as dear old Danny Chalkley and many others claim. The key causes of ongoing and often worsening congestion is that most local authorities continue cutting the amount of road space that the majority of people are allowed to use. And, as this report ends on Crossroads Rider, Let battle continue in the fight against robber barons – were ever and who ever they may be and whatever they’re trying to nick, be-it our cash or public highway road space!

Let it snow let it snow let it snow – and let the traffic slow to a shambolic halt in London

Buses, cars, vans and trucks have been stuck in a chaotic mess in London during the last two days. At surface level this seems to be due to an inch or so of snow and temperatures dropping just below freezing for a few hours – and a failure by our traffic managers to cope with that happening. But, why does a well predicted episode of regular climate change, in one of the most advanced cities on the planet, turn a relatively small weather event from a little drama into a big crisis? Many beleaguered travelers are asking Who Is To Blame? But finding the real answers may be harder than they realise. And, in addition to most children there are some lucky folk who are able to see these events through rose tinted goggles as ‘brilliant’. One lady features in a news video for the Guardian and goes so far as saying that “everyone’s having a good time”. She goes on to rave. “All the schools are shut. Brilliant! No-one’s at work. Brilliant! No cars on the street. Brilliant!” I kid you not, but suggest that there are a significant number of us for whom the snow and traffic chaos fell a little short of being brilliant. For me, snow is fine but treacherous road conditions and hellish essential journeys are not – and the key reasons for this ridiculous state of affairs are not in my view practical.

The real driving force in Britain generally and London in particular, is the obsession our traffic managers and transport planners have with prevailing theories about the ideal ways to move people and goods. But as most of us realise we do not live in an ideal world, and better distinctions need making between worthy attempts deliver real improvements and action that is guided by dogma fuelled dreams…

Over the years I have noticed variations in public attitudes and transport authority’s responses to episodes of snowfall in UK towns and cities. Generally, the extent of disruption to essential travel or ‘traffic chaos’ caused by a well predicted fall of an inch or two of snow has less and less impact on daily urban life, the further north you are from London.

It can be argued that this is because it snows more up north and so the people and their local authorities have more pressing and frequent needs to be properly equipped and prepared to minimise the impact that snow and freezing temperatures has on essential travel. It can also be argued that the pots of money from which all road management must be funded are if anything shrinking in size – and this inevitably leads to decreased capacity for local councils to meet demand for such rudimentary action as gritting roads before it snows and freezes.

But in my view there is a far more critical reason why a well predicted inch of snow on a Monday in December can turn road transport in London into a slithering shambles of misery and massive waste of that most precious of all resources on earth, time.

The key to the problem is this. Wherever you look at those who are responsible for urban traffic management there is an all pervading orthodoxy that paves the way for chaos raining as soon as it snows. The fact is that the main thrust of efforts by a generation of highway planners and traffic managers is directed by an obsessive quest for a transport holy grail. And the grail is called ‘modal shift’ or ‘behaviour change’. And what it is about is the business of ‘discouraging’ people from using privately owned motor vehicles. Over the last two decades enthusiasm for this mission has reached levels of religious fervour and devotion among and increasingly widespread range of people and town planners. The ‘motorists’ or truck driver is vilified as a selfish, environment and planet destroyer and so anything that makes the use of cars vans and trucks more difficult has become a jolly good thing.

So although this is rarely mentioned in polite circles, the incentives to really optimise the flow of traffic, especially in London, is as close to zero as makes no difference. And this applies to council traffic controllers, and hoards of highly paid transport planning professionals in TfL or various wings of central government’s bureaucratic machine. At either end of the UK transport pros spectrum the big prizes only go to those who come up with measures that will, in theory at least, ‘get people out of cars and vans’. This invariably involves making life more difficult for drivers, and failing to grit roads is one thing that does that for sure. Or, fail to grit the side roads that are where people live and need to drive, and that overloads the main roads till they get gridlocked.

The real problem for all of us is not the occasional outbreak of snow, that most city controllers in the rest of the developed world wouldn’t dare allow to bring life to a crawl. The real problem is that the unfortunate quest that drives our traffic managers really is for a non-existent holy grail. The modal shift grail being passionate pursued for two decades has not happened, despite the well spun stats that seem to show it has. And, in reality there is no plausible evidence to show that modal shift can occur to any truly significant extent in Britain. This is for the simple reason that the alternatives of walking, cycling and public transport cannot meet the vast majority of needs we have for the transport of people and goods on which the nations’ health depends.

But there is an even bigger elephant in the room that our traffic management gurus and there disciples fail to see. Even in London, which has the greatest abundance of ‘public’ transport in the form of buses on it’s urban road network than anywhere else in Britain, it is important to recognise what these vehicles really are.

A bus is actually a big privately owned and heavily subsidised truck for carrying heavily subsidised people. And when these vehicles are not running close to empty which many are, the occupants during peak times are transported in conditions that would cause outcry if they were cattle. The much loved and hated ‘Bendy-bus’ is in fact an absurdly long, junction blocking and occasionally deadly articulated lorry.

Now, if you mix the collection of vehicles that are in reality needed to keep life in our cities going, shroud the management of traffic in a cloak of wishful thinking and then sprinkle the whole caboodle with an inch of snow, you get we what we usually get. Good old TRAFFIC CHAOS!

Transport professionals faith in climate change agenda takes big hit as top UK Journal describes ‘major blow’ to public trust

Although the title and content of Local Transport Today (LTT) might suggest that its greatest role might be as the featured anorak mag on Have I Got News for you, it is a twice monthly bible and font of wisdom for the top, and most influential transport professionals in Britain.

And, as such, it is likely that the following LTT article may well have more potential to trigger significant change in attitudes among transport policy and implementation professionals than most single news items...

There have, of course, been many reports of concern over the scientific legitimacy of the basis for constraining use of motorised transport to save the planet. These appear with increasing frequency in a vast range of news sources from mainstream print and TV media to Twitter. But, IMHO, very few have the potential to trigger such an eventually significant shift in attitudes among transport policy as the piece below. With thanks to Landor Publishing for permission to reproduce here.

illustration chosen by TC.com while LTT says…

Transport-climate agenda at risk as ‘consensus science’ crumbles

Public trust in the transport climate change policy agenda may have been dealt a major blow by the unauthorised release of emails and computer code from one of the world’s leading climate science centres, the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU). (TC adds that the email leak from CRU is now under investigation)
The material shows that a small group of the climate scientists have worked to block publication of academic papers by skeptics, refused to release data following Freedom of Information Act requests, and even appear to have manipulated data to strengthen the argument that man’s CO2 emissions are warming the planet.
Climategate’ - as the incident has been dubbed - has swept across the intern et with Google this week recording over 12 million pages using the term. Mainstream media coverage has been patchier but here too the ‘consensus’ view that the science is “settled” is breaking down. A page article in The Sunday Times discussed the ‘The great climate science scandal’ and Wednesday’s front page headline of The Daily Express went further, reporting ‘The big climate change fraud’.
The re-opening of the scientific debate could be significant for transport, given the almost universal acceptance of the man-made warming paradigm within the sector.
The Association of British Drivers, which has been the only transport campaign group to refuse to accept the “settled science” policy framework, said the emails “vindicated” its stance. “UEA is at the centre of research on current and past temperatures, which claims that the modem warm period has been unprecedented due mainly to man-made CO2 emissions,” said its environment spokesman Paul Biggs. “But what if the scientific process has been manipulated, by an influential group of scientists who also dominate the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], in order to make a stronger case for man-made global warming and create and protect a consensus? Some unambiguous emails suggest that this is exactly what has happened.” There are signs of a growing backlash against the climatechange agenda within the Conservative Party. “Today, the economic climate makes people question whether we can afford the expense of these policies,” said prominent MP David Davis in The Independent this week. He said the “fixation” of the green movement with setting ever tougher targets was a policy “destined to collapse”. Read More »

Climategate: Leaked emails scandal, What scandal? Inquiry looms for climate change science but will it knock wheels off the global warmers wagon – or be just another brick in the wall to divide believers and sceptics?

Whatever you think about man-made climate change and worldwide plans to cut personal mobility and spend trillions on addressing the global warming ‘problem’, there is no doubt that we are reaching a critical and potentially dangerous turning point. The point is this. After some resistance an inquiry is now looming to investigate a momentous leak of emails that cast doubt on the motives of climate change scientists. These communications are between key people at the vanguard of the ‘science’ on which world leaders and their publics base many passionately held beliefs that man-made global warming is real is set to create insurmountable catastrophe and doom for us all.

And in case you didn’t know, this latest development follows a big leak of emails that throws new light on the validity & reliability of ‘evidence’ from pro global warming scientists. But that has prompted more news carrying worms to crawl out of the woodwork of various skeleton cupboards. It now transpires that a BBC bod with a blog ‘decided’ not to bother reporting the leak as soon as he knew about this undeniably momentous and newsworthy event.

So, it is now clearly crucial that we have an inquiry into this ‘theft’ of private email correspondence between key figures whose ‘scientific’ research and government advisory work is paid for with public funds. But there is far bigger and potentially more dangerous issue at stake here for us all in our age of mega spun ‘news’ and politicised science.

The future direction of government thinking about climate change thought the developed world could be changed in the aftermath of this inquiry – or not. And what happens next may depend on one thing above all. Is it possible or likely that this investigation will o be a truly independent examination that will reveal as much truth as there is to be found between the lines of these communications? The Economist shares my concerns and view that ‘political orthodoxy must not silence scientific argument’.

At this point I would love to say that the answer to that question is the same as it is on TV talent shows, namely, you the public decided. But sadly we can’t always get what you want you know, but maybe if we try hard some times we just might find that we what get what we need…